Mike Huckabee Speaks About-
On Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell:
“I wouldn’t support a repeal if I were commander-in-chief…You don’t see foot soldiers out there demanding it. I’m not sure that’s the most important thing we ought to be doing for the military. … [‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’] touches an extraordinarily small group of people. [Calls to repeal it are] primarily a posturing point for political purposes [and an attempt to] force something on the military that they themselves haven’t pushed that hard. I think we certainly should be very sensitive to the fact that the purpose of the military is not to see if we can create social experiments.”
I agree on this point, no one in the military gave thought to, Don’t Ask Don’t Tell when I was there. The only time I heard about it was in the… reception meeting. No soldier cares, if your gay or not. you want someone that has your back, that could be a monkey theoretically speaking, They should be focused on having proper equipment for our soldiers. They should focus on proper veteran services. I don’t think the military should have to be at the tip of the gay vision for a better tomorrow. We are not accepted as a basic existence, girls and boys are being mistreated around the country for being gay.
As far as politics, yeas the liberals are making this an issue. They are making it an issue so when they repeal it, it will seem a great victory for gay rights. This is how Obama plans getting out of gay marriage, by making don’t ask don’t tell an issue and then throwing us a bone.
On marriage equality:
“Even civil unions are not necessary. I think there’s been a real level of being disingenuous on the part of the gay and lesbian community with their goal of civil unions…You don’t go ahead and accommodate every behavioral pattern that is against the ideal. That would be like saying, well, there are a lot of people who like to use drugs, so let’s go ahead and accommodate those who want who use drugs. There are some people who believe in incest, so we should accommodate them. There are people who believe in polygamy, so we should accommodate them.’”
This is where I get to destroy you Mike Huckabee. The constitution declares a government that will service the people, The purpose of marriage is to maintain the family unit as an institution. It is not a moral medium of society, it is a law that was made to prevent not define. Therefore we would by right be avail to the use of the legal medium of marriage, we could naturally have families. So claim Lesbians who get sperm with their own right and inseminate. They created a family and therefore have the right to use the medium of marriage to protect it. You have no argument on letting Lesbians not have marriage.
“Against the ideal” is the key to your blindness. You say we don’t have to accommodate every behavioral pattern that is against the ideal.
We do not…. dear sir, you are correct.
Did you include in the 2010 census that being gay is against the ideal? where did you get this little bit of information, in what statistic or book does it say gay is not ideal?
Accommodate is the wrong word, millions of law abiding citizens live outside what you will call ideal, I think this is a cuase to consider it within the ideal. 116 million people voted in the 2004 for the presidential election, I would assume they would be the ideal people you are referring to? Out those ideal people, I promise you in fact…… I am willing to wager, most will consider Gay ideal.
Within your opinion…. I fear some fatal part, just broke.
Even outside it, the arrogance to call people whose only difference to the rest of society is their sexual differences…. “not ideal”, is preposterous! Sexuality is a personal matter, government should not have to broach or discuss sexuality, it should just include anyone……….did I say it………. anyone, even polygamist incest or marrying a cheetah.
Government should not have a right to tell you what is ideal sexually….it is uncosnttunial as Obama’s health-care atrocity.
Government does not decide what is ideal sexually, you offer the service and we as a republic will use it as we see fit. Do not dictate to us…… not the republicans or the masquerading democrats, all hungry for power.
On gay adoption and foster care:
“I think this is not about trying to create statements for people who want to change the basic fundamental definitions of family. And always we should act in the best interest of the children, not in the seeming interest of the adults…Children are not puppies. This is not a time to see if we can experiment and find out, how does this work?”
Children come messed up out of any walk of life. Children come out complete from any walk of life. A family is a unit not defined by blood and that is fact. Fact as the sky is blue and the water of the Hudson a putrid green.
What you miss in this picture is beyond what you could experience. You feel…. because what you know as a family consists of a mother father and child. How many times without the gay equation has this proved to be wrong? How many times has blood do nothing but hurt. I know kids that have been molested by their blood fathers or mothers. I know kids that have been inflicted horrors that would make you piss your slacks.
I ask you to look at your child and think of the love you have for him and, to think that it could be defined by simply blood.
You must want to believe we as a society can love, and raise others with that love. It is not an experiment but a beautiful reality you sadly deny. – LADY
